Public Warning Systems: Debunking Myths, Revealing Facts
Advancing public safety through clarity and insight
There are numerous examples of successful national public warning system implementations, even at a very large scale. Yet, particularly in the Global South, stakeholders often face significant obstacles that slow progress. At Intersec, we frequently hear that such systems are “too expensive,” “too complex,” or “too intrusive.”
With this podcast series, we aim to unpack some of the most common misconceptions and provide practical guidance to governments, telecom regulators, and operators in their decision-making processes around alerting technologies.
Myth #1
Security threats, industrial accidents, pandemics, child abductions — the scope of an EWS goes far beyond earthquakes and floods.
Myth #2
Severity alone doesn't determine the right channel. Immediacy, scale, and opt-out rates all matter — and nearly 1 in 3 Texans has already switched Cell Broadcast off.
Myth #3
The real question is simpler: does this message need to wake people up in the middle of the night? That single test determines the right channel.
Myth #4
Adding LB SMS to a CB project is a marginal investment. Failing to reach people properly costs far more in human lives, not just budget lines.
Myth #5
UN EW4All opened major funding channels — but grants can be slow and incomplete. Private sector accessibility programmes and long-term financing partnerships are changing the picture
Myth #6
Coordination, infrastructure, testing — that's months of work, right? Not anymore. Cloud deployment means a national PWS can be fully operational in a matter of days.
Myth #7
Regulatory compliance, fraud detection, new revenue streams, and public pressure: once operators see the full picture laid out, the conversation changes quickly.
Myth #8
A dedicated alert SMSC, completely separate from everyday traffic, can handle tens of thousands of messages per second without touching regular network capacity.
Myth #9
Inbound visitors and outbound travellers can both be reached. HLR Bypass for incoming roamers, passive location tracking for your own subscribers abroad.
Myth #10
The system matches each message version to a SIM language profile. One citizen, one message — in the right language.
Myth #11
Level 1 is loud by design. But levels 2, 3, and 4 give authorities full control: sound, vibration, or complete silence — including a quiet all-clear at 3am.
All myths in one file
All the fact-checking in one comprehensive document, so decision-makers stay informed and avoid the mistakes misconceptions can cause.
Failing to alert and inform the population properly has a far higher cost than any warning system itself. And that cost is not just financial... it is human too.
”Does this message need to wake people up in the middle of the night? If the answer is yes, Cell Broadcast is probably the right call.
”Being on roaming does not stop you from receiving location-based SMS alerts. Operators can reach everyone, visitors and travellers alike.
”Deploying a warning system is no longer just a question of budget. It becomes what it should always have been: a necessity for building resilience in the face of crises.
”Get started with Intersec
We've deployed public warning systems across four continents. Yours could be next. Let's start with a conversation.